The IssueTrackingWikiProtocol is used for pages which are intended for tracking open and resolved issues. In order for this to work, we've created a few simple rules for modifying these pages.
We keep two kinds of pages - OpenIssues and ResolvedIssues. Items are originally created on the OpenIssues page, and then moved to the ResolvedIssues page, once they've been resolved according to the originator of the issue.
All issues are numbered with a permanent number. The Wiki won't do this for us conveniently, so the following format is used 2). Parentheses are used to keep the wiki from autonumbering the paragraph. Every issue number should be accounted for between the OpenIssues page and the ResolvedIssues page.
1) LarsMarowskyBree thinks we need some more documentation on Wiki etiquette
AlanRobertson isn't quite sure he understands what is wanted here.
2) AlanRobertson thinks we need to have someplace in the Wiki to track open and closed issues for the LocalResourceManager.
1) LarsMarowskyBree thinks we need some more documentation on Wiki etiquette
AlanRobertson isn't quite sure he understands what is wanted here.
Eventually we created the WikiEtiquette page.
2) AlanRobertson thinks we need to have someplace in the Wiki to track open and closed issues for the LocalResourceManager.
Eventually he creates the LocalResourceManagerOpenIssues page, the LocalResourceManagerResolvedIssues page, and the IssueTrackingWikiProtocol page to document the intended process.
Uhm, the examples above are not sorted in reverse order ... was this intentional?
And, may I suggest to use the Include macro instead, like in [[Include(BaseNameOpenIssues/IssueName)]]
This ways you have one subpage per issue, which stays the same and can even be bookmarked. The macro invocation then can easily be moved from the OpenIssues to the ResolvedIssues page.
-lge